I agree 100% that you can and must take the lane here. I will note that I’ve had cars honk at me from behind when doing so under this particular underpass numerous times. Once was quite loud as it

Right. And even though you have the legal right to take the lane in such a situation, it's still a very good idea to communicate unambiguously to motorists that you are doing so. So when you take

Julie, Great idea! I just did it... Request ID# 1925391 - New Sign (Traffic Signs) A comment has been added to New Sign (Traffic Signs) Service Request ID# 1925391: Thank you, Fremont

Agree with everything that has been said so far. I'll just add that this is one of many situations where staying as far to the right as possible Is not the same as staying as far to the right as

I agree with Ken that you simply need to take the lane and make it clear that there is no room to safely pass you within the lane. My habits have changed of late and I no longer think that it’s

I’m not aware of a ‘share the road’ sign or a sharrow marked on the road - worthwhile contacting City’s Public Works staff? Julie

Agree with Ken, it's the only safe way to ride that section.

Absolutely - this is a classic example of a situation where you should ("must", even, I would argue) take the lane. There is not enough room to share the lane with a car/truck/van. Wait for an

Hi Ted, I agree, that's a tricky section of road and I always dread riding through that tunnel. Sorry to hear that you had a bad experience there today. My approach is to "take the lane," as they say.

Ted, I go through there quite often without any problem. I wait for a gap in traffic, signal with my left arm, and move to the center of the right lane. When there is no bike lane, taking the entire

Hello, I've had yet another dangerous encounter under the bridge on Mission Blvd between Stevenson traveling to Las Palmas. The location is here: https://goo.gl/maps/7JUqT2xFAeVYVmzU7 For years

I think there's a drafting error in the bill. Here's the bill text: I think the new section 22450(c) is a problem. As written, a cyclist at a 4-way stop would have to yield to ALL cross traffic. I

Done, Thanks for the heads up.

The Idaho stop might be coming to California! That would be awesome.-- Mark

There's a handy "Track Bill" option near the top of the page that will send email notifications of the progress.

I just sent a letter of support to my assemblyman, Rob Bonta, who represents Oakland, Alameda, and San Leandro. Thanks for sending us this information, Nathan. Donna Kaplan

The below was recently included in the Silicon Valley Bike Exchange newsletter. I wasn't aware of it previously. Thought it might be of interest... Bicycle-Related Legislation in California Assembly

Hi Barry, Thanks for the clarification. Best regards, Satish

Hi Satish, The FFBC board has not yet reopened the calendar for rides. This is a topic that the board discusses every meeting and, coincidentally, there is a board meeting followed by a club meeting

Hi, I see group rides listed in the online ride calendar starting in April. Is that true or just wishful thinking on my part? Thanks, Satish