Re: Wide Corners at Walnut
Vinnie Bacon
Good points. Of course, it’s dangerous for cars to cruise through those right-turn lanes at 15-20 MPH. We could cause our own problems flying through the new lanes at 10-15 MPH.
And yes, I will use the vehicle lane on Walnut, especially since there is another lane for cars there. Why they didn’t drop down to one lane there I don’t know. Traffic volumes at the intersection?
Vinnie Bacon e: vbacon@... p: 510-796-8870
From: Michael Graff <michael.graff@...>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 11:42 AM To: Greg Vicksell <vicksell@...> Cc: Andrew Sass <andrew.sass@...>; Tim OHara <timorides2@...>; info@ffbc.groups.io; Vinnie Bacon <vbacon@...>; hlarsen@... Subject: Re: [public info] Wide Corners at Walnut
The new side paths and intersections are designed for slower cycling, 10-12 mph max. If I rIde them at that speed, I can generally avoid right-hook and drive-out collisions with motorists, and conflicts with pedestrians.
Faster than that, we should use the roadway.
Another thing I've noticed on Walnut, and at the fancy new intersections, is that bikes and peds don't strictly follow the lines painted for them. Bikes and peds use each other's crosswalks, and travel in both directions on both the sidewalk and side path. If we're going to build more of these, we might as well accept that and make them Class I multi-use paths. The attempts at bike-ped separation don't work.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 11:25 AM Greg Vicksell <vicksell@...> wrote:
|
|